For several years, as a consequence, Memorial Day was “an appeal to patriotism of one section at the expense of the pride and feeling of the other section,” the Times observed. It was not truly a day to remember the “patriot dead,” but a triumphalist jamboree, a “memorial of the triumph of Northern loyalty over Southern rebellion.”
Before long, accordingly, the South began to hold separate Memorial Day services a month earlier than the North. On the Confederate Memorial Day on April 26, 1875,
For a long time, their call went unheeded. Jefferson Davis did not help the cause of national reconciliation when he wrote three years later that Confederate Memorial Day “commemorate[s] men who died in a defensive war” and whose “heroism derives its lustre from the justice of the cause in which it was displayed. . . .” Six weeks later, as if replying directly to Davis, William T. Sherman told the large crowd gathered at Arlington National Cemetery, including President Hayes, that “all over this broad land this memorial day has been dedicated to the beautiful custom of decorating with earth’s fairest and freshest flowers the graves of the patriot men who died that we might possess in peace a united country and a Government worth having.” And patriots, in the idiom of 1878, did not include the Southern dead. “Our forefathers are called patriots,” acknowledged the Atlanta Constitution the next year, “and our fathers are called rebels.”
Perhaps because of revanchist opinions like Davis’s—or the suspicion of them—Memorial Day remained a sectional observance even when it was legally declared a national holiday in 1885. By the turn of the century, however, hearts had begun to change at last. In the Spanish-American War, Northern and Southern soldiers had come under fire together again. Albert D. Shaw, the Grand Army of the Republic’s commander-in-chief, said publicly that the last Sunday in May should henceforth commemorate all American soldiers who had died in battle. “On this occasion there could be tributes alike to the fallen men of the confederacy, the union army, and the brave soldiers who died in the war with Spain,” he said.
Shaw was not speaking for himself alone. On Memorial Day 1900, Confederate and Union veterans joined together to unveil a monument on the Antietam battlefield. “I am glad to meet, on this memorable field, the followers of Lee, Jackson, and Longstreet with the followers of Grant and Sherman and Sheridan, greeting each other with affection and respect,” said President McKinley, who had himself fought for the Union at Antietam. Although he admitted that he was glad that “we were kept together and the Union was saved,” he was also glad for Appomattox and the meeting there between Grant and Lee. “There must be comfort,” he mused, “in the fact that American soldiers never surrendered to any but American soldiers.”
From that day to this, Memorial Day has been a truly national holiday. Any differences between Americans are set aside in the grateful recognition that we are united by the best among us: American soldiers who have never surrendered—with God’s help, will never be forced to surrender—to any but American soldiers.
Never in our long association, Dr. Myers, have I ever thought that I would read in one of your writings a reference to one of my favorite CW generals, Nathan "Shanks" Evans, who reached his high point at the beginning of the war and made preciptous descent thereafter. Perhaps, it was his tendency to be rash, or (and I love this), his tendency to go into battle accompanied by his "barrelito," a subordinate with a bourbon keg strapped to his back--perhaps it was coincidental. Anyway, for me he, not Lee, was the quintessence of the Southern military and of the type of person who flourishes in the andrenaline world of war.
ReplyDeleteOne problem, he died (predictably) fairly young in 1868 and you quote him in 1875, unless I'm missing something.
There have been days of teaching when I've thought it would be nice to be accompanied by a barrelito.
Clearly, it is not Gen. Nathan Evans. The newspaper account identified him simply as “Gen. Evans.” Was there another Confederate general named Evans?
ReplyDeleteYes, there was. He was Clement Anselm Evans, who (fittingly) became a preacher after the war.
ReplyDeleteStupid error corrected above.
An error, perhaps, but not a stupid one. Anyway, you gave me the opportunity to think about old "Shanks" again. BTW: he may have done some of what you said at the end of the war. (I don't have the bios in front of me.)So perhaps you offered a blended bio.
ReplyDeleteThanks.
Paul,
ReplyDeleteHad you ever heard of Clement Evans before?
General Clement Evans was one of Lee's divisional commanders late in the war and participated in Lee's last attack, an attempt to clear the road west of Appomattox CH. Gordon was in overall command of the attack.
ReplyDeleteEvans and his troops fought a skillful battle, said to have been one of the best "left-wheel" attacks in the war, but to no avail for Grant was able to keep reinforcing the lines to the west, thus blocking Lee's retreat. The surrender came the next day.
It WAS General Nathan Evans, however, who accompanied President Davis in his flight from Richmond into Georgia, as you said.
Well, I’m not sure I said that, but I am glad to know.
ReplyDelete